« Ind. Law - Strengthened public records law passes Senate | Main | Ind. Courts - S0uth Bend Tribune editorial opines on judicial mandates »
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Law - "Citing Cost, States Consider End to Death Penalty"
That is the headline to this lengthy NY Times story today by Ian Urbina. Some quotes:
When Gov. Martin O’Malley appeared before the Maryland Senate last week, he made an unconventional argument that is becoming increasingly popular in cash-strapped states: abolish the death penalty to cut costs.The Times has this graphic on the cost of capital cases.Mr. O’Malley, a Democrat and a Roman Catholic who has cited religious opposition to the death penalty in the past, is now arguing that capital cases cost three times as much as homicide cases where the death penalty is not sought. “And we can’t afford that,” he said, “when there are better and cheaper ways to reduce crime.”
Lawmakers in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska and New Hampshire have made the same argument in recent months as they push bills seeking to repeal the death penalty, and experts say such bills have a good chance of passing in Maryland, Montana and New Mexico. * * *
Capital cases are expensive because the trials tend to take longer, they typically require more lawyers and more costly expert witnesses, and they are far more likely to lead to multiple appeals.
In New Mexico, lawmakers who support the repeal bill have pointed out that despite the added expense, most defendants end up with life sentences anyway.
That has been true in Maryland. A 2008 study by the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan public policy group, found that in the 20 years after the state reinstated the death penalty in 1978, prosecutors sought the death penalty in 162 felony-homicide convictions, securing it in 56 cases, most of which were overturned; the rest of the convictions led to prison sentences.
Since 1978, five people have been executed in Maryland, and five inmates are on death row.
Opponents of repealing capital punishment say such measures are short-sighted and will result in more crime and greater costs to states down the road. At a time when police departments are being scaled down to save money, the role of the death penalty in deterring certain crimes is more important than ever, they say. * * *
States are looking elsewhere as well.
Last year, in an effort to cut costs, probation and parole agencies in Arizona, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey and Vermont reduced or dropped prison time for thousands of offenders who violated conditions of their release. In some states, probation and parole violators account for up to two-thirds of prison admissions each year; typical violations are failing drug tests or missing meetings with parole officers. * * *
As prison crowding has become acute, lawsuits have followed in states like California, and politicians find themselves having to choose among politically unattractive options: spend scarce tax dollars on expanding prisons, loosen laws to stem the flow of incarcerations, or release some nonviolent offenders.
The costs of death penalty cases can be extraordinarily high.
The Urban Institute study of Maryland concluded that because of appeals, it cost as much as $1.9 million more for a state prosecutor to put someone on death row than it did to put a person in prison. A case that resulted in a death sentence cost $3 million, the study found, compared with less than $1.1 million for a case in which the death penalty was not sought.
The ILB has had several earlier entries on the costs of death penalty cases. They have mainly focused, however, on the costs of trial and retrial at the local level. The Muncie Star-Press had a long story on Sept. 28, 2008 (ILB entry here) on "the role that a county's financial status plays in whether a local prosecutor pursues a death sentence." Unfortunately the story itself is no longer available.
This ILB entry from Feb. 17, 2008, headed "Wilkes trial costs adding up," also has links to entries about the Rios and Camm trials.
This ILB entry from Nov. 5, 2006, looks at Indiana's death penalty legal costs at the appellate level.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on February 25, 2009 08:01 AM
Posted to General Law Related