John F. Csicsko, M.D., et al. v. John Hill, et al. (3/24/04 IndCtApp MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION) [Medical Malpractice]
Robb, Judge
Because we hold the trial court did not err in finding that the Release executed between the Hills and the Fund did not release the physicians from liability, and the trial court did not err in refusing to find that the Hills received the maximum amount allowed under the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act, we affirm the trial court’s decision.Note: I'm looking into why this unpublished opinion from March 24th was posted today - check back for the answer.
Here we go. This from the docket to the case:
4/22/04 APPELLANT'S JOINT PETITION FOR TRANSFER (9)Posted by Marcia Oddi at May 14, 2004 03:00 PM
PROOF OF SERVICE (2) MAIL LS
4/22/04 APPELLANTS' PETITION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT (6)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (2) MAIL LS
4/22/04 APPELLEES' MOTION TO PUBLISH (6) PROOF OF SERVICE (2)MAIL LS
5/11/04 ISSUED THE ENCLOSED ORDER:
5/11/04 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO PUBLISH OF APPELLEES JOHN HILL AND SUSAN HILL IS GRANTED, AND THIS COURT'S OPINION HERETOFORE HANDED DOWN IN THIS CAUSE ON MARCH 24, 2004, MARKED MEMORANDUM DECISION, NOT FOR PUBLICATION, IS NOW ORDERED PUBLISHED.
THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND COPIES OF SAID OPINION TOGETHER WITH COPIES OF THIS ORDER TO THE WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY AND TO ALL OTHER COMPANIES, SERVICES AND INDIVIDUALS TO WHOM PUBLISHED OPINIONS ARE NORMALLY SENT.
JAMES S. KIRSCH, CHIEF JUDGE
ALL PANEL JUDGES CONCUR. MS
5/13/04 ****** ABOVE ENTRY MAILED ******
5/13/04 *** OPINION HAS BEEN UPDATED TO REFLECT THAT IT IS A FOR PUBLICATION DECISION. *** MS